chemical sensitivity

Fashion is Toxic, but What's the Haulternative?

Speaker: Sarah Peel
Written by: Sheena Jain & Esha Jain

As children, we were used to our parents picking out our outfits, but eventually we were given the opportunity to discover who we were within the world of clothes. Using the language of fashion, clothing allowed us to learn to speak about ourselves. When we get dressed we take on the role of an artist, painting a self-portrait, highlighting interesting and attractive things about who we are and in the process clear up any misconceptions. Clothing and style give a crucial introduction to the self. Fashion is creative, and acts as a form of self-expression. Frances Corner stated “faster than anything else, what we wear tells a story of who we are or who we want to be.” In addition to the importance of personal style and fashion, it is important to know how your wardrobe is being processed and manufactured.  Sarah Peel is the program director of Fashion Takes Action (FTA), Canada’s only fashion oriented non-profit organization. Their mission is to advance fashion sustainability through education, awareness and collaboration. FTA takes a systems thinking approach, which entails working with academics, the public, various brands, industry and consumers.

The fashion industry is the second largest global polluter for overall impacts after oil. It is the second most chemical dependent industry. 8000 chemicals turn raw materials into textile. These toxic chemicals pollute 5,640,000 Olympic sized swimming pools of water per year. The environmental problems associated with the textile industry are those associated with water pollution from the runoff of untreated waste during the processing of toxic chemicals used when producing clothing. The toxic chemical use is of environmental concern, as it decreases oxygen concentration due to the hydrosulfides, which block the passing of light through water and becomes detrimental to the water ecosystem. The chemicals used get evaporated into the air we breathe and can get absorbed through our skin, resulting in allergic reactions and can cause harm to children prior to birth. Moreover this chemical pollution can cause physiological and biochemical alterations, resulting in impairments to our respiratory and reproductive systems and eventually lead to mortality.

There are dye houses worldwide that are notorious for polluting the local water supplies by dumping waste water into local streams and rivers. A solution to this particular issue includes the use of waterless dyeing. Dyeing clothing works best in an airless environment with pressurized high heat, which allows the dye to disperse throughout the fabric. This method could be practical for polyester and natural fibers such as, cotton and wool. The down side is that the fabric can become damaged when undergoing such a process. Nonetheless as 45% of all fibers comprise of cotton, perhaps this could be a solution of improvement for producing less water waste. Other methods include AirDye, which uses less water and energy to dye their products. This allows air to disperse the dye, so that the dye can be embedded within the fibers instead of just superficially, thus allowing for long lasting colour and the ability to withstand more washings. Lastly one company uses DryDye technology. Instead of water, they use compressed and pressurized carbon dioxide to diffuse the dye within polyester fabric. The CO2, takes on a liquid-like property and is contained in stainless steel chambers. After the dyeing cycle, the CO2 becomes gasified and the dye within the cotton fibers condenses as it separates from the gas. The CO2 is then recycled and pumped back into the dyeing vessel. Thus using CO2 is safe and environmentally friendly as the gas is contained and can be used repeatedly without the risk of any gas being emitted.

The fashion industry employs more than 200 million people worldwide, which does not include cotton farmers. 80% of garment workers are women. 36 million people living in modern slavery, supply to various chains of Western brands. As a society we purchase 400% more clothing today than we did 20 years ago. A lot of that goes to waste because it is not quality clothing. Therefore this is considered a fast fashion garment that has a short product life cycle. Such that factory workers in economically disadvantaged situations work in poor conditions to create a product that is considered disposable. Since the product does not last long and is never found in vintage shops, the clothing does not get recycled, but gets dumped. Sarah stated that every household in Ontario sends approximately 48 kilograms of textiles to the landfill per year. She urges consumers to donate old clothing instead of wasting it, as textiles can be repurposed.

It is necessary to be aware that clothing manufacturers are using an array of toxic chemicals on new garments. Flame retardants are used to protect the product during shipping. Therefore that new clothes smell is actually flame retardants in which the clothing has been dipped in. Formaldehyde is also used as an anti-wrinkle and to prevent mildew while the items are being shipped. Formaldehyde is a highly toxic chemical that by the International Agency for Research on Cancer has been classified as a carcinogen. In a study conducted in New Zealand, it was found that clothing produced in China emitted levels of formaldehyde up to 900 times over the limit considered safe for human use. Such clothing is sold daily in other countries with less strict regulations. People with chemical sensitivity, who have been exposed to heavy toxin loads, may suffer from headaches, fatigue, nausea, aches/pains, and breathing difficulties. Those who do not have particular sensitivities can experience rashes, in areas where the clothing is tight.  

A report regarding 20 top fashion retailers stated that two-thirds of their clothing contained nonylphenol ethoxylates, which in high concentrations can disrupt the endocrine system of animals. The products were also found to contain high levels of toxic phthalates and cancer-causing amines from carcinogenic dyes. Since Greenpeace’s Toxic Threads/Dirty Laundry campaign, large retailer companies from the fashion industry have begun working on phasing out harmful chemicals used in the processing of their products. Additionally Greenpeace continues to urge companies to eliminate such chemicals as perfluorochemicals, which are used in water-proofing fabric, and eliminate the use of alkylphenol ethoxylate, used in detergents; and to additionally allow consumers to follow and be aware of what chemicals and type of manufacturing process is being used. Only 16/600 dyes are approved by the Environmental Protection Agency as safe for human and environmental health. Therefore it is necessary to wash new clothing before initial wear and to try to find clothes with nontoxic dyes.

When purchasing your wardrobe, ask yourself is it sustainable fashion? Sustainable fashion refers to any process used to attempt to make the production of that textile more conserving and ecologically safe; by avoiding the depletion of natural resources and without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. Therefore things to go over include:

  • Locally made

  • No waste

  • Fair trade, responsible labor

  • Use of organic, sustainable or recycled fibers

  • Natural, non-toxic dyes

  • Slow fashion (not mass produced, quality made garments)

  • Can be applied to all garments, shoes and accessories

The 7R’s of fashion crusaders

  • Reduce the amount of clothing you buy

  • Reuse garments

  • Recycle (many textiles are recycled and used for clothing)

  • Repurpose clothing

  • Research

  • Repair/tailoring

  • Rent clothing

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS:

1)  What other substances should I be aware of?

  • Brominated Flame Retardants – used on children’s sleepwear

  • Perfluorinated chemicals – used to make breathable synthetic fabrics

  • P-Phenylene diamine (PPD) – used as colouring agent on black clothing, leather and hair dyes

  • Phthalates – used to make plastics softer, i.e. new shoes or synthetic clothing and jackets

 2)  What can I do to avoid toxic exposure and how do I shop now?

  • Wash any new clothes before wearing (Note this will NOT remove certain types of chemicals)

  • Shop for natural fibers i.e. cotton, bamboo, linen or wool (refer to list in question #3)

  • Avoid permanent-press or wrinkle-free clothing and try using steam to eliminate wrinkles instead

  • Avoid direct skin contact with synthetic or treated fabrics, especially in hot or humid weather, as your pores open and admit more toxins

  • Avoid products labelled water-resistant unless the manufacturer provides details of chemicals or processes used

  • Purchase second-hand clothing

  • Purchase locally made or organic clothing items, as well as natural and vegetable dyes

  • Look for fabrics that are Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS) certified

 

3)  What are some healthier textile alternatives?

HEALTHIER TEXTILE ALTERNATIVESEXAMPLES

ALTERNATIVE PLANT FIBERS:

 

Considered sustainable, as they are produced in small quantities, cultivated without pesticides and come from plants that are not agriculturally produced.

-  Aloe

 

- Abaca

- Banana leaves

- Coir: from outer shell of coconut palm

- Flax

- Kapok: used in cushions, mattresses and life jackets

- Milkweed

- Nettle

- Pina: from leaves of pineapple

- Raffia

- Sisal: agave plant used in production of rope and twine

FIBERS FROM BY-PRODUCTS:

 

From industrial, agricultural or commercial production. Most fall under category of rayon.

Defined by origin and type of processing to become a textile

- By-product fibers that are rayon processed are regenerated

 

 as cellulosic fibers and include: Lenpur and Cupro.                                                                

- Azlon fibers are by-products of naturally occurring proteins

 industrial food production; soy milk protein fibers are most

 common These proteins are subjected to enzymatic

 treatments and a wet spinning process to create a filament,

 which is used to create the fiber.

OTHERS:- Bamboo                                                                                                

 

- Cashmere: animal fiber, a type of wool, biodegradable and can be recycled                 

- Cotton                                                                            

- Linen: is biodegradable                                                                      

- Lyocell: type of rayon fiber produced from cellulose of trees and is biodegradable

- Nylon                                                                                                

 - Polyester: polyethylene terephthalate, some is biodegradable                                            

- Seacell: blend of lyocell and seaweed, ideal for undergarments due to soft and anti-bacterial qualities                                                                                                      

- Silk                                                                                                                          

 - Straw: after grain harvested, can be used for bedding, feed animals, used to make hats, sandals, rope or paper.

- Wool

 

SOURCES:

1)      Floyd, Allison.”Toxic Threads’ No More: Fasion Industry Increasing Transparency, Reducing Impacts.” Sustainablebrands.com. Web.23 Mar. 2017. <http://www.sustainablebrands.com/news_and_views/articles/fashion-industry-increasing-transparency-reducing-impacts>.

2)   Kaye, Leon. "Clothing to Dye For: The Textile Sector Must Confront Water Risks." The Guardian. Guardian News and Media, 12 Aug. 2013. Web. 23 Mar. 2017.

      <https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/dyeing-textile-sector-water-risks-adidas>.

3)   Sana Khan (4), and Abdul Malik (4)(5). "Environmental and Health Effects of Textile Industry Wastewater." Springer. Springer Netherlands, 01 Jan. 1970. Web. 23 Mar. 2017. <https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-94-007-7890-0_4>.

4)   The Alternative Daily. "Are You Wearing Clothes Treated with Toxic Formaldehyde?" The Alternative Daily. Web. 23 Mar. 2017. <http://www.thealternativedaily.com/clothes-treated-with-toxic-formaldehyde/>.

5)   "The Serious Business of Clothes." The Book of Life. Web. 23 Mar. 2017.  <http://www.thebookoflife.org/the-serious-business-of-clothes/?utm_source=You%20Tube&utm_medium=You%20Tube%20-%20Why%20Clothes%20Matter%20-%20Video%20Description%20-%20TBOL%20Article&utm_campaign=You%20Tube%20-%20Why%20Clothes%20Matter%20-%20Video%20Description%20-%20TBOL%20Article>.

6)      "Toxic Fashion." Toxic Fashion.Web. 23 Mar. 2017.<http://toxicfashion.org/chemical-txtsust.html>

 

Proper Assessment of Toxicant Exposures and How They Relate to Your Health

Speakers: Dr. Winnie Siu & Dr. Aviad Elgez
Written by: Sheena Jain & Esha Jain

Dr. Siu and Dr. Elgez are a part of EnviroMed, a clinic that specializes in Environmental Medicine. Their mission is to educate their patients and the community regarding the connection between the state of the Environment and human health. Working alongside Dr. Mansoor Mohammed, a clinical Geneticist, they focus on proper genetics and home environment assessments as well as environmentally exposed individuals suffering from the following illnesses:

  • Multiple Chemical Sensitivity

  • Fibromyalgia

  • Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

  • Autoimmune Conditions

  • Chronic infections/Mild-immunosuppression

    • e.g. Chronic Lyme Disease

  • Neurological Conditions

  • Electro Hypersensitivity Syndrome

  • Non-responsive patients to standard treatments

They found that the conditions listed above as well as many other illnesses are directly related to daily environmental exposures of pollution, workplace hazards, radiation, climate change, pesticides, mold, plastics, heavy metals, solvents and electromagnetic frequencies.  Their goal is to identify exposures that are related to health concerns.

In understanding what we are being exposed to, it is important to ask the following question: “what is the difference between toxins and toxicants?”

  • TOXINS come from a biological source like molds or bacteria. This means that a toxin is a poisonous substance produced within living cells or organisms. (E.g. Mycotoxins, Biotoxins etc.)

  • TOXICANTS are synthetic chemicals, such that the poisonous substances are created by artificial processes. (E.g. metals, pesticides, solvents, PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyl) & Phthalates)

The doctors at EnviroMed focus on the total environmental load and the non-specific load and try to decrease the total body burden by figuring out the source and reducing exposure as much as possible. They have created an analogy of a barrel. The barrel is a toxic barrel that represents what we carry  within us.

Within the total body load is this toxic barrel that is filled with water at the bottom and oil at the top. The barrel also consists of a faucet at the bottom where toxic materials are released from the body.

The water can contain volatile organic compounds (VOCs), plastics, heavy metals, arsenic and aluminum to name a few. These are not persistent therefore the body can clear them out rapidly and get rid of them completely. The oil contains PFOA (Perfluorooctanoic acid), DDT (Dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane), lead and mercury. These are persistent, as the body has minimal capacity to remove them, taking months to years to clear them. If the level of the toxic material within the barrel rises, to the extent at which toxins are entering the “barrel” faster than they are being removed, the faucet may cause a backup of the harmful substances. This is when patients start demonstrating symptoms of toxicity. Therefore it is important to remove as much toxic material as possible in order to ensure adequate functioning of the body.

There are 2 components affecting the opening of the “faucet.”  While some factors may cause the faucet opening to be wide, others may cause it to be narrower.

  1.    Genetics Varying genetics between individuals can cause a 4-10x difference in the rate at which toxicants are cleared from the body. An example of this is alcohol consumption. While one individual may consume a full glass of wine and experience no symptoms, others may consume as little as half a glass of wine and become flushed. Genetics is the key element responsible for this difference. The reason being is that alcohol gets metabolized into an aldehyde, which gets processed and emitted from the body. There are specific genes that encode enzymes that are responsible for the rapid metabolism of alcohol in some individuals, while other genes can slow the rate of removal of aldehyde. Such that individuals of Asian descent lack the enzyme that breaks down aldehyde and thus get aldehyde toxicity. Therefore, even a small amount of alcohol consumption, can cause symptoms of intoxication. Thus even with similar exposure and environmental factors, individuals can experience different symptoms based on their genetics.

  1.    Nutrients Specific nutrients are needed in order to remove toxins from the body. However, long term toxin exposure leads to depleted nutrients, causing the “faucet” to narrow. This causes a backup of toxins within the barrel and can become difficult to reverse. This is seen in an individual who consumes large amounts of alcohol on a regular basis, ultimately experiencing vitamin B1 deficiency.

Therefore it is essential to clear out as much as we can from the top of the barrel (55%-90%) and open the faucet to remove things from the bottom of the barrel. Once the toxicants are removed and identified, determine what genes are affected and up regulate those genes through dietary changes, such as eating kale or broccoli. Such greens will genetically upregulate what nutrients are deficient. Other options include, doing colonics for cleansing. Genetics could lower your symptoms based on chemicals you are exposed to. Therefore limit toxin exposures.

The following are substances to beware of and the negative health effects they encompass:

Toxic SubstanceNegative EffectsAdditional Information

BPA & BPS- Hormone Disruptors

 

- Carcinogenic

- Menstrual irregularities

- Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS)

Phthalates- Neurotoxic

 

- Immuno/environmental mitochondrial

 disrupters

- Females: Hormone Disruptor

- Young Males: ↓ Testosterone Levels

- Liquid plastics added to

 

 hard plastics in order to

 make them softer

 (i.e. saran wrap)

Heavy Metals- Mercury

 

   → Neurotoxin

   → Anxiety, Irritability & Fatigue

- Lead:

   → Parkinson’s Disease

   → Children: Neurological Developmental

        Issues

- Arsenic

- Mercury

 

  → Note there are large

       amounts of mercury in

       tuna

- Arsenic

  → Leaves body rapidly,

       therefore you do not

       need to worry too much

       about it, just get rid of

       the source.   

  → Note that Arsenic from

       seafood and shrimp is

       not toxic

  → Arsenic from rice or

     non-organic chicken is

     very toxic.

Solvents/Molds- Neuropathy

 

   → May have a hangover feeling in the morning

- Found in Memory Foam &

 

 Soil

- Have off-gassing

Organophosphate Pesticides- Neurotoxins

 

  → Depression

  → ADHD

  → Autism

  → Parkinson’s Disease

- NOT persistent

 

  → Therefore clears rapidly

       from the body

  → However, if you do not

       eat organic foods, you  

       will be re-exposed to

       these pesticides every

       day

PCBs & Dioxins- Developmental problems in developing

 

 fetuses

- Neurotoxicity

  → Parkinson’s Disease  

- Persistent and therefore

 

  remain in the body longer

- Mostly in fish

   → Therefore leads to

        bioaccumulation within

        the food chain

Molds & Mycotoxins- Neurological symptoms

 

  → Memory loss

  → Fatigue

  → Decrease concentration

- Immune symptoms

  → immunosuppression

- Chronic sinusitis & congestion

 (Linked to mold exposure 99% of the time)

 

Discussion Questions:

1) Can toxin exposures that affected your great grandparents persist in your genes and change your DNA?

A study was conducted in which pregnant lab rats were exposed to an agricultural fungicide, Vinclozolin. This endocrine disruptor was meant to interfere with the process of the fetus becoming male or female. However, sexual differentiation was unaffected. What they did find was when male offspring’s reached adulthood, they had lower sperm counts and decreased fertility. They believed the study was insignificant. It was not until, someone within the lab made an error and continued to bred more rats; such that grandchildren were bred from the rats who had been exposed, creating a fourth generation i.e. great-grandchildren of the originally exposed rats. They decided to investigate the next generations and found that the three generations after the initial pregnant mother exposed to the fungicide, also displayed low sperm counts, but was not due to a change within their inherited DNA sequence. Uncertain of this finding, they bred more rats and continued to test them, using more chemicals that lead to diseases in the prostate, kidney, ovaries and immune system. Over and over again, they discovered these diseases were being seen in the fourth and fifth generation offspring of the mothers who were originally exposed to a chemical. Biologist Michael Skinner found that as toxins were entering the rats, they altered the configuration of methyl groups that hung onto DNA in the fetus’ germ-line cells, and eventually became its egg or sperm. He used the analogy of burrs on a knit sweater to explain the methyl groups latching onto the DNA in particular arrangements.  It was these methyl molecules that were interfering with the functioning of the DNA and was being passed onto future generations, causing them to face the same diseases. Skinner conducted another study in which he exposed pregnant rats to bug spray, jet fuel and BPA. He yet again found that each exposure exhibited a distinct pattern of methyl groups attached, that persisted in the great-grandchildren of the pregnant rats that were initially exposed. Skinner concluded that your great-grandmother’s environment does affect your health and that the chemicals she was exposed to may be traceable in the future.  An example of this is seen within an unintentional human trial with DES (diethylstilbestrol) exposure. DES was a medication given to pregnant women from the 1940’s to the 1960’s, to prevent pregnancy complications. Later it was discovered that DES negatively affected those exposed in utero, females affected by vaginal cancers and males affected by testicular abnormalities. Studies of grandchildren of DES exposed mothers are now surfacing, findings display that this generation may suffer from infertility, reproductive birth defects and some cancers.

 

2) What is the interaction between nutrition and environmental toxin exposures?

There are 3 main ways in which nutrition and toxicants interact:

i. Food can be the source of exposure to toxins

       - Toxic chemicals can be presented to the food while it is being grown

       - The processing and storage of food may also increase hazardous chemical content of food

              → (e.g. drying or smoking food over coal-burning stoves as seen in Chinese rural communities,

                   increases food arsenic content)

              → Another example in which food acts as a source of toxicant exposure is through fish and

                   seafood, due to the methylmercury.

                       - Inorganic mercury is released into the air, settles in water and undergoes methylation

                       - 2 studies were conducted, which presented prenatal and early postnatal exposure to

                          seafood. Both studies resulted in having children with cognitive deficits, which included

                          attention, perceptual and selection language deficits.

ii. Nutritional deficiencies influence the level of exposure and toxicity

      -  Lead exposure is associated with cognitive deficits in children, especially among disadvantaged

          populations.      

          Evidence exists for interaction between lead and nutrients at the level of intestinal absorption,

          neurochemistry and cognitive function.

          Note: Iron and lead share a common intestinal transporter, such that, iron deficiency contributes

             to increased lead absorption.

             There has been some evidence that adult women and children who consume higher amounts of

             dietary calcium have lower blood lead concentrations. Also placental transfer of lead was lower

             in women who consume diets rich in iron and who have higher hemoglobin levels.

        -   Another example would be cadmium exposure, which is associated with renal tubular toxicity,

            decreased bone density, and increased bone turnover and fractures. Other than tobacco smoke,

            diets are the main source of environmental cadmium exposure. Cadmium is especially high in the

            following foods:

                 → Shellfish

  → Leafy veggies

                 → Rice

                 → Cereals

                 → Legumes

           Evidence shows that low iron stores and intake are associated with higher body cadmium

           burdens. As both cadmium and iron are absorbed into the small intestine by the divalent metal

           transporter 1, once inside enterocytes, cadmium is moved via calcium transporters and

           ferroportin, into the blood stream. The absorption of cadmium may increase at early states of

           iron deficiency, even before iron absorption is observed.

iii. Nutrient deficiencies and toxicants yield similar outcomes

  • Arsenic exposure for example may occur from ground water in areas such as India and Bangladesh. It is also common in drinking water in areas such as Mexico, Argentina and Vietnam, where an estimated 100 million people are exposed to levels above 100g/L.

  • Other sources of arsenic include: coal-burning stoves and contaminated food.

  • Arsenic is associated with lung and bladder cancers, skin lesions, and in populations with high arsenic exposure, diabetes mellitus and hypertension are prevalent.

  • In children, arsenic is associated with low IQ scores, decreased memory and attention.

  • A study conducted, presented evidence for the association among nutrients, and arsenic toxicity in Bangladeshi women. With a double burden of women of reproductive age being vulnerable to nutritional deficiencies and environmental exposures, women become a source of exposure to their fetuses and infants through placental exchange and breast milk. Therefore, when toxin exposures interact with poor nutrition, it results in high costs to the health and well-being of the resource-poor individuals and communities, who are less likely able to cope with those costs.

 

Sources:

1)   Interlandi, Jeneen. "The Toxins That Affected Your Great-Grandparents Could Be In Your Genes." Smithsonian.com. Smithsonian Institution, n.d. Web. 26 Jan. 2017.<http://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/the-toxins-that-affected-your-great-grandparents-could-be-in-your-genes-180947644/>.

2)   Joshua. "Difference Between Toxin and Toxicant." Difference Between. N.p., 22 Dec. 2011. Web. 26 Jan. 2017.

          <http://www.differencebetween.net/science/difference-between-toxin-and-toxicant/>.

3)   Kordas, Katarzyna, Bo Lönnerdal, and Rebecca Stoltzfus. "Interactions between Nutrition and Environmental Exposures: Effects on Health Outcomes in Women and Children." The Journal of Nutrition, 01 Dec. 2007. Web. 26 Jan. 2017. <http://jn.nutrition.org/content/137/12/2794.full>.

4)   "Our Mission Statement – EnviroMed Clinic." EnviroMed Clinic. N.p., n.d. Web. 26 Jan. 2017. <http://enviromedclinic.com/our-mission-statement/>.

5)      Tuller, David, Dullhunk/Flickr, Tom Philpott, and Sydney Brownstone. "Can Exposure to Toxins Change Your DNA?" Mother Jones. N.p., n.d. Web. 26 Jan. 2017.<http://www.motherjones.com/blue-marble/2012/06/can-exposure-toxins-change-your-dna>.

Human Health Conditions Related to the Environment

Speaker: Dr. Chelsea SchreinerWritten by: Sheena Jain & Esha Jain

The nature versus nurture controversy has been argued for as long as we can remember. Even when it comes to our health and the reasons why we develop certain health conditions this discrepancy does not cease to exist. Although it is debatable as to whether genetics or the environment is the main source of the majority of our health conditions, studies have shown that both are equally responsible for many of the issues that we encounter.

Genetics aside, if we were to strictly isolate the environmental factors contributing to the detriment of our well-being, the manner in which external activity enters our bodies and affect us, raises additional concerns. If we outlined a simplified version of the overall process it would consist of the following:

  • Source Activities (i.e. industry/energy factories, transportation, domestic activities, waste management, agriculture, nature, radon, forest fires & volcanos etc.) →  EmissionsEnvironment (concentrated in air, water, food, soil) →  Exposure Dose, Absorbed dose, Target organ dose Health conditions (subclinical, morbidity, mortality)

The environmental sources become far more complex once we try to define how “toxic” the substances emitted into the atmosphere need to be and the amount of exposure time required in order for them to negatively impact us. Furthermore, many times we assume that we are only being exposed to 1 substance and fail to acknowledge the synergistic effects of the numerous toxins that coexist in the environment. We also seem to neglect the multisystem effects that these harmful agents have on our bodies. What is even more complicated is the fact that it is difficult to isolate the substances that we are being exposed to. Since we live in a global village where produce can be imported from across the ocean and transportation can travel from miles away, we are typically affected by the toxins emitted from across the globe. Just because certain practises release harmful agents in one side of the world, it does not mean that we are safe from its exposure. Lastly, if we were to revisit genetics for just a moment, the issue becomes even more multifaceted as genetic predisposition can cause some individuals to develop various health conditions at far lower amounts of toxin exposure compared to others.

What exactly is it about these chemicals that are so damaging to our bodies? Well, these agents commonly target our endocrine system, the powerhouse encompassing many of our fundamental hormones. The effect on one hormone can essentially be the beginning of a chain of events further impairing the function of far more hormones. For instance Bisphenol A (BPA), a chemical commonly found in plastic material, epoxy resins and thermal paper receipts has estrogen mimicking affects, in particular it binds to estradiol receptors. This cannot only affect the reproductive system and mammary glands but it can also cause a decline in aldosterone and cortisol levels in addition to causing the thyroid to suffer by binding to body proteins.

The following describes additional hormonal effects of toxins that we are commonly exposed to:

Organ System Chemicals & Their Effects Tests Preventative Actions Thyroid Polybrominated Biphenyl (PBBs): - Men: Thyroid CancerEstrogenic Chemicals (BPA, Methylparaben, Triclosan, PBDEs): - Disrupt thyroid hormone

  → (↑estrogen levels leads to ↓ thyroid hormone         levels) Heavy Metals: - Hypothyroidism (possibly even Hashimoto’s     Thyroiditis)   → Mercury can trigger Hashimoto’s Disease          because Mercury takes up iodine and therefore        the thyroid is unable to make any more thyroid        hormone  

- Thyroid Exam - Labs - Thyroid   Ultrasound - Blood  → Metal &         Chemicals        levels - Avoid Heavy Metals Reproductive Flame Retardants (PBBs) - Fibroids, Endometriosis, Menstrual Irregularities - Women: Breast Cancer - Little Women: Precocious Puberty  → Young girls are exposed to chemicals longer          than they should be therefore they develop       breast budding and early menarcheDioxins [in PVC pipes & papermills] - Fibroids, Endometriosis, Menstrual Irregularities - Little Women: Precocious Puberty

Phthalates, Parabens & BPA - Fibroids, Endometriosis, Menstrual Irregularities - Little Women: Precocious Puberty - Breast Cancer, Uterine Cancer

- Saliva  (preferred)   or Blood    → Hormone          Levels    → Chemicals    → Genes    → Detox - Avoid  Plastics - Use safer   Plastics   (i.e. coded           2, 4, or 5) - Use plastic   Alternatives    → Glass    → Stainless         Steel Respiratory Asthma

Inside: Dust                → Dust sticks to various chemicals from                        off-gassing                     (i.e. flame retardants)

Outside: Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons                 [from coal, gas, tobacco and diesel                                  exhaust]

Toxic Trespass: Dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane(DDT), Benzene

- Blood  → IgE levels  → Chemical        levels - Avoid air   Filters - Wash   bedding &   clothing   regularly

 

Conditions Developed from Toxin Exposure Symptoms Test Preventative Actions Multiple Chemical Sensitivity/

Environmental Illness

- Headache - Pain - Sensitivity to perfumes & certain      foods - Fatigue - Fainting/Dizzy Spells - Speech Abnormalities  → Change in        Rate, Rhythm & Volume - Behavioural changes   → Jittery   → All over the place- Impaired detox ability - Genetics - Detox   Chemicals - Avoidance Electro-hypersensitivity Syndrome - Affects functions of electronics - Dizzy/Spacey spells - Vibration sensations - Pain - Affects Digestion & Hormones - Heavy Metal  levels  (in body) - Avoid Heavy  Metals  → do not use       heavy metal        spring beds - Turn off Wi-Fi Cancers

(Causes: BRCA gene, PBBs, Parabens & Phthalates)

Cancers are a state of progression: 1) Energetic disturbance → 2) Functional disturbance → 3) Structural/physical disease →   4) Cancer- Symptoms are based on organ of   disease Prevention via: - Avoidance - Proper nutrition - Lifestyle  Modifications - Taking care of  emotional health

 

As demonstrated there are numerous conditions affiliated with the exposure of the countless toxins released into our atmosphere from our everyday activities. The best way to prevent these ailments from developing inside us personally is to take precautions to ensure that we make safer choices on a daily basis. Some of these practises include: ensuring adequate water and indoor air quality, quality food sourcing, using body care products that are free of harmful toxins, as well as preventing exposure to electromagnetic fields by turning off Wi-Fi and avoiding the use of heavy metal spring beds. Additionally, frequent testing of our genetic susceptibility, hormone levels within our saliva, as well as metal, toxic, and chemical levels within our blood cannot only give us a better idea of the harmful agents that already exist within our bodies but also allows us to manage them before they start becoming detrimental to our health. Routine detoxifications can remove these agents from our blood and tissues before they can accumulate and develop into a life threatening condition. Overall, as long as we remain aware and make a conscious effort to protect ourselves from what is preventable, we will be one step closer to keeping ourselves healthier within a toxin infested environment.   

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

1)   What research exists regarding the correlation between mercury and the development of Hashimoto’s Thyroiditis?

There is conflicting evidence available regarding the correlation between mercury and the development of Hashimoto’s Thyroiditis. A study conducted on 1352 females ages 16-49 demonstrated that low concentrations of methylmercury (the form of mercury typically found in fish) was associated with subclinical autoimmunity. It was concluded that the exposure of methylmercury could potentially be the reason behind the development of autoimmune disease later in life.

Another study found that mercury exposure was related to increased autoantibody levels and therefore presumed that mercury exposure was the source of autoimmune dysfunction.

Other reports have insinuated that mercury exposure was insufficient in being the sole cause of autoimmunity and that other elements needed to coexist. They suggested that factors such as increased intestinal permeability needed to be present in order for mercury to adequately generate an autoimmune response.

Although one study demonstrated no direct correlation between mercury amalgam fillings and the development of Hashimoto’s Thyroiditis, another report found a relationship in individuals with hypersensitivity to inorganic mercury. The study analyzed 39 autoimmune thyroiditis patients and discovered that those with mercury hypersensitivity, exhibited significant decreases in both their thyroid peroxidase (TPO) autoantibody and thyroglobulin antibody levels, after the removal of their mercury amalgams.

Additionally other research conducted has depicted a direct correlation between mercury exposure and the thyroid gland. Some studies have shown decreases in T3 and T4 levels due to mercury. There has also been evidence demonstrating that exposure to low concentrations of mercury vapour can directly affect the function of type I iodothyronine deiodinase, one of the enzymes necessary for thyroid hormone formation.  

2)      What are the effects of electromagnetic field exposure on infants and children?

In recent years, it has been found that cell phone use by pregnant women has been related to the development of hyperactivity and emotional issues in their children. This could potentially explain the current rise in children suffering from attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). One study found that school children in Switzerland experienced increased concentration problems, ADHD symptoms and a decline in academic performance after turning on nearby cell towers. Additionally, research conducted on the Skrunda radar station in Latvia in the 1990’s found that children in close proximities to the station demonstrated decreased levels of attention, memory and learning abilities in school.   

Other research findings have demonstrated a direct correlation between electromagnetic fields and the development of autism. One study conducted by Dietrich Klinghardt measured the amount of body voltage and microwave power density levels in pregnant women, depending on their sleeping locations. He then compared these levels in pregnant women who gave birth to healthy children versus those who later gave birth to autistic children. His findings concluded that pregnant women exposed to greater amounts of body voltage and microwave power density gave birth to autistic children. His reasoning behind these findings was that wireless radiation promoted the growth of molds and bio-toxins responsible for autism. Another analysis performed in 2007, implied that wireless technologies prevented the excretion of heavy metals, like mercury in autistic children.  It was further suggested that electromagnetic fields were responsible for potentially opening the blood brain barrier, increasing the concentration of toxins that permeated into the brain and enhanced their toxic effects. It was also proposed that by reducing glutathione levels, electromagnetic fields interfered with the body’s natural defenses, which was needed to combat toxin exposure. Finally, regarding the relationship between electromagnetic fields and autism it was hypothesized by Andrew Goldsworthy that microwaves played a role in disrupting the neuronal pruning process and were therefore responsible for causing autism. More recently, the Bioinitiative Report in 2012 provided addition information correlating microwave exposure and autism.  They illustrated additional theories regarding the manner in which electromagnetic fields caused autism. Some of these included: reducing glutathione levels and therefore increasing oxidative stress, interfering with calcium signalling, causing cell membrane peroxidation, affecting the blood brain barrier, disturbing immune function, being genotoxic, causing mitochondrial and melatonin dysfunction as well as causing damage to the brain cells.

Finally, a study conducted in Vernon, New Jersey discovered a rise in Down syndrome among children living in close proximities to satellite uplinks in microwave bands and in children of radar operators.

3)   What are some effects of electromagnetic field exposure seen in animals?

 

Animal Electromagnetic Field Effects Monkeys - Behavioural Disturbances Pigs - Miscarriages Cows - Conjunctivitis

- Itching

- Reproductive Problems

  → Decreased Milk Production

- Behavioural Disturbances

  → Dancing/Weaving in stalls   → Tilting head away from transmission towers   → Nervousness & Disoriented

Horses - Behavioural Disturbances

   → Nervousness & Jumpy

   → Volatile Behaviour

- Loss of Balance

- Abnormal Gait - Increased infection

Birds - Abnormal Neuronal Firing

-  Abandoned nest sites near cell towers

  → Fewer eggs

  → Decreased population

     → due to a combination of cell tower collections & Electromagnetic                    waves interfering with navigation

- Lower productivity in nests

- Plumage deterioration

- Chick deformities - Partial Albinism

Bees - Abandoned Beehives

   → Nearby cell towers can interfere with their navigational skills

- Lower honeycomb weights

- Disorientation

- Impairs susceptibility to viruses, fungi and other microorganisms     → Increased sensitivity of bee’s NADH oxidase enzyme to

         electromagnetic fields which interferes with their nitrogen monoxide

         system and disrupts their:

         learning capabilities, olfactory orientation & immune systems

Insects & Worms - Heat shock responses in:

   → Soil nematode Caenorhabditis elegans    → Fruit flies

 

SOURCES:

1)    "Can Mercury Be A Trigger For Hashimoto’s Thyroiditis and Graves’ Disease?" Can Mercury Be A Trigger For Hashimoto's Thyroiditis and Graves' Disease? N.p., n.d. Web. 30 Nov. 2016. (http://www.naturalendocrinesolutions.com/articles/can-mercury-be-a-trigger-for-hashimotos-thyroiditis-and-graves-disease/)

2)    "EMFWISE." Scientific Research on Wireless Health Effects. N.p., n.d. Web. 30 Nov. 2016. (http://www.emfwise.com/science_details.php#arrhythmia)

 

3)   "Hashimoto's Thyroiditis and Mercury Toxicity." Hashimoto's Disease. N.p., 03 Sept. 2016. Web. 30 Nov. 2016. (http://drhedberg.com/hashimotos-thyroiditis-and-mercury-toxicity/)