World Environment Day: It’s time to #BeatPlasticPollution

Honour Stahl, Executive Director, WHEN

Co-written by Jane McArthur, Toxics Program Director at Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment and Karen Wirsig, Plastic Program Manager at Environmental Defence

This year, the focus of World Environment Day is to #BeatPlasticPollution. And there are so many reasons to do it, from protecting the environment and all living things from the pollution caused by plastic manufacturing, use and waste, to ensuring workers who make plastic products aren’t being exposed to the dangerous chemicals that are used in the process. 

Winning the fight against plastic pollution will require tackling each toxic branch of the plastic  “death-spiral”, from cradle to grave. From the extraction of oil to the exportation of waste, plastic pollutes the air we breathe, the food we eat, and the water we drink.

Worldwide, 460 million tonnes of new plastic are made in a year and production is rising exponentially. Single-use plastic waste is at record levels, with a hefty climate toll. One report warns: "Plastics are essentially fossil fuels in another form…98% of single-use plastics come from fossil fuel feedstocks. It is no coincidence that ExxonMobil, one of the biggest fossil fuel producers in the world, also ranks as the world’s top producer of single-use plastic." 

Despite widespread use of plastics in healthcare, plastic is not benign

One of the plastic industry’s favourite pro-plastic arguments is to say that their product is a health care hero. They say the need for plastics in healthcare means we can’t ban or control its production. This argument seeks to shut down the conversation. It also ignores some important facts when it comes to plastic’s impact on our health.

It is true that there are many applications for plastics in health care. From intravenous bags, specimen collection containers, catheters, syringes, vials and gloves, plastic is ubiquitous. However, some of these uses come with health costs that Industry fails to mention when it centres healthcare applications in its defensive messaging. 

Plastic devices made of polyvinyl chloride plastics (PVC) containing di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) to make them flexible, are of particular concern to physicians and healthcare workers in the care of their patients. PVC, DEHP, and other toxic substances in plastics are harmful to humans even in healthcare settings. Certain populations, including dialysis patients and hemophiliacs, have long-term exposures to troubling amounts of DEHP, and newborn babies are exposed during critical points of development. This exposure can lead to a range of adverse effects in the liver, reproductive tract, kidneys, lungs, and heart. Developing infants and children are particularly susceptible to effects on the reproductive system.

Plastic is costing us. Big time. The global costs of treating plastics-related illnesses and trying to clean up waste in the environment are pegged at a staggering $800 billion CAD

But the reality is that safe alternatives to plastics in healthcare are already being implemented. One US healthcare provider has already eliminated the use of PVC and DEHP in IV bags and is prohibiting PVC in  new furniture and flooring. We expect this trend to grow. 

Workers manufacturing plastic products are exposed to a cocktail of toxic substances

Workers are exposed to high levels of carcinogens, neurotoxins, heavy metals, flame retardants, phthalates, bisphenols, and endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) during plastics production. Retired Pebra Plastics Plant worker and former union local president Rose Wickman reports miscarriages, hysterectomies, infertility and deaths among co-workers. Wickman and others worry that “nobody wants to listen to the workers.”  

Women, racialized, and Indigenous people disproportionately experience the adverse health outcomes of the manufacture of plastics and exposure to plastics in and around consumer goods. Sarnia, Ontario, is home to one of the largest clusters of manufacturing facilities in this sector and workers and residents in nearby communities, including Aamjiwnaang First Nation, are suffering from exposure to toxic gases, chemical waste, and air pollution. 


Plastic is taking over our grocery stores, and that means it’s in our food

But plastic pollution does not stop there. With more than 70 percent of grocery store products wrapped in plastic, exposure to toxics has become unavoidable for the average consumer. Plastic pollution is a risk to public health that is causing concern for more and more people in Canada, with some populations at more risk than others. The high levels of endocrine disrupting chemicals in plastics cause disproportionate harm to people with ovarian reproductive systems. 

With human health at risk, government must do better at getting plastics off the shelves and out of healthcare settings where possible. With the recent success of a modernized Canadian Environmental Protection Act that will – for the first time in federal law – include the right to a healthy environment, reducing plastics is not only possible but a right to be acknowledged for the sake of human and planetary health. But action cannot stop there. 

The solutions are clear and we must move on them together

Governments, who met last week in Paris to continue negotiations for a global treaty on plastic pollution,  must commit to an ambitious deal that includes major reductions to plastics production worldwide, keeping oil and gas in the ground, executing more comprehensive single-use plastic bans, building large-scale refill and reuse systems, and holding big polluters like Exxon – which is the majority shareholder of Canada-based Imperial Oil – accountable for putting profits over people. 

Canada’s federal government also needs to keep up the pressure to eliminate single-use plastics, phase out hazardous chemicals related to plastics,  and replace packaging, where it’s needed, with reuse and refill systems. 

Clean up your Act: Environmental Rights in Canada

Bill C-28 was tabled this spring, and it seeks to reform our toxics legislation under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, or CEPA. This Act is long overdue for reform, and there are some improvements in the Bill, but there is a massive problem with its framing of environmental rights. 

The Bill proposes that our right to a healthy environment be “balanced” with relevant factors, including…economic…factors” against economic considerations - which is how we got into our current climate, toxics and biodiversity mess in the first place. 

This latest report from WHEN offers some recommendations on where we can improve our CEPA reform efforts post-election, and we hope you read it, share it and use it to hold candidates and elected officials accountable so that we can strengthen this Act, and gain environmental rights in the process. 

env-rights-en.png

Environmental Rights in Canada

droits-env.png

Les droits environnementaux au Canada

World Environment Day 2021: Environmental Rights Now!

WHEN joins our colleagues at the David Suzuki Foundation, the Canadian Environmental Law Association and environmental health organizations across the country to seek progress on C-28 and the modernization of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA).

We urge the Hon. Pablo Rodriguez, Leader of the Government in the House of Commons to place Bill C-28 on the House agenda for debate at the earliest opportunity, and to work with the House Leaders of other parties to enable a vote at second reading before World Environment Day, June 5, 2021.

See our joint letter here.

WHEN, 19ToZero COVID Vaccine Q+A

WHEN was pleased to host the 19ToZero network of experts to provide our community with information, and answers to their vaccine questions.

Thank you to Dr. Harjot Singh and Dr. Nathan Rider for joining us, to our board member Melanie Jarcaig for sharing her ‘long haul’ story, and to our co-facilitator Claire Donnici for providing us with the evidence-based information we need to inform our health care decisions.

You can watch the recording here.

Video: 57 minutes

No Consequences: Toxic Exposure, Weak Enforcement and Environmental Racism

This report highlights the impacts of weak enforcement of CEPA on Canada’s vulnerable populations. Inadequate CEPA enforcement and accountability disproportionately impacts the racialized and low-income communities in proximity to industrial facilities, and creates hazardous occupational conditions for workers.

There is an opportunity to prioritize enforcement activities to protect vulnerable populations, such as Indigenous, racialized and low-income communities who face inequitable exposures to toxicants.

Available in English and French: